Blog Schedule

Can you tell me how the UltraConservative movement reconciles being ProLife AND Pro Death Penalty?

Please keep the spin to a minimum, Thx.

Public Comments

1. It is a matter of state's rights... The question is does the federal government have the right to tell a state how they should regulate a medical procedure! STUDY! How do ultralibe reconcile evolution and man made global warming? Or, how can PETA claim to be pro choice? or, how can you be against phone tapping but for gun bans? (why is one Amendment more important than the other) OK! I have answered yours... now answer some of these?
2. babies do not murder rape and commit heinous crimes
3. Babies are innocent, Ted Bundy was not. No spin required.
4. All of us are human, we all have positives and negatives. Science has been trying to figure out why humans act like they do since ancient times. How does Ultra Liberals reconcile being anti death penalty but will not care if a viable infant has it's brains sucked out. If you can figure all that out, your Nobel prize is waiting for you.
5. One is innocent and one is guilty as hell. Next.
6. Because the Bible justifies the death penalty, but not murder (and they believe that it is murder). In an execution, the death is punishment for an offense...in an abortion, the death is just to avoid an inconvenience (the fetus didn't do anything wrong).
7. So being for first chances and against second chances makes us more hypocritical than being against first chances but for second chances?
8. they dont match
9. a contradiction in terms... just pure hypocrisy...
10. I've answered this exact same question for you before. Do you actually read the answers or do you just get a rise out of seeing your name on the list of questions?
11. If the death penalty is limited to actual murderers, there is no contradiction (although arguably it is not a good idea to give that power to the government, due to our "justice" system's systemic incompetence). Unfortunately, many favor the death penalty for non-murderers, which is absolutely unjustifiable as murderers forfeit their right to life when they commit murders but a person who commits any lesser crime does not (no matter how heinous the crime is).
12. One human had due process and was convicted by a jury of their peers, the other didn't.
13. innocent baby; guilty murderer Next....
14. Your deserving of life until you take away someone elses.
15. That's fairly simple Abortion is murder of an innocent Death penalty is Justice for the convicted.
16. Truth is, your question is an excellent example of spin. How can anyone possibly draw any valid parallels between abortion and the death penalty?
17. You misunderstand. We are Pro innocent life. If someone murders another then by law they forfeit their own lives. A baby does nothing wrong and does not deserve to be executed for the sins of the mother. How can a liberal defend a cold-blooded murderer arguing for their worthless life but, so easily says kill babies because the mother should not be inconvenienced?
18. You are obviously not interesting in getting real answers and this is actually supposed to be a rant. You must not know any conservatives if you have such a stereotypical attitude. Many conservatives are against the death penalty. Now what other issue would you like to find so you can hate someone different from yourself. Whatever happened to tolerance?
19. This is how I believe THEY think. That a fetus is an innocent baby and a death row inmate is a convicted murdered (usually). So it is Ok to murder the murderer, sorta of an eye for an eye kind of thing. I am pro-choice and pro death penalty so at least I feel logical. edit: HAHA, I answered before I read the posts and see that I am correct.
20. Yes. Jebus told them to do it.